We are currently migrating files to replenish the compromised collection here at DarkDox.com
Pardon our dust.
We have plans to bring you much more in the near future and need your help. Please consider contributing so we can take the time and resources needed to bring this free service to humanity. We have no corporate sponsorships and we refuse to ever consider it. Help us grow!
You can donate at the link below using PayPal, any credit card or debit card, and more with a one time donation or subscribe to become a producer for regular special content exclusive to you as well as say in new content!
Tune in this Sunday, January 20th on Eternal Affairs Media BlogTalkRadio for our 13th episode!
In this lucky 13th episode of DarkDox Digest, Christian Coffins analyses and Netflix’s new interactive film, Black Mirror: Bandersnatch. A brilliantly executed live action, role playing, very meta, game/film that is an homage to “choose your adventure” books which were popular in the 1980’s where this film is set. Underneath of the fun and games of it all, like any other Black Mirror story line, there is something very sick and twisted that is festering…
In other news, DarkDox’s Facebook page has been unpublished due to sharing the photograph of a ten year old “drag queen” who was posing for a photo with a naked adult man.
Thank you everyone who have stuck it out with our turbulence! We are currently unloaded over 300 new videos! So keep an eye on the site for new content, sections, and much more!
We updated our No Agenda section. If you have not been keeping up with this podcast, you need to catch up.
We are working on several documentaries, TV shows, and podcasts.
We could use your help. The more money we raise, the more time we can spend bringing you new content.
Please donate what you can below. Donations of $150 or more will get a 1TB hard drive with our entire archive mailed to them!
Sacred Owls BEWARE! TAKE CARE! SACRED OWLS 2018 U.S. TOUR TO BOHEMIAN GROVE’S CREMATION OF CARE PROTEST
This is it. The big one. The thing we have been fighting for almost 10 years now. So technically it is also the 10 YEARS OF THROWING IT THE FUCK DOWN TOUR, as well. We are facing our arch nemesis, The Bohemian Grove (Yes, that is the owl we put a buster on). We are teaming up with DarkDox, Coffins Collective, & Resist the Grove, Bohemian Grove Action and Resistance to bring you a 19 day, 12 state, U.S. Tour…
TO THE GATES OF THE BOHEMIAN GROVE TO PROTEST THEIR MENS ONLY (UNLESS YOU ARE A BOY) PEDO DEATH CULT CREMATION OF CARE OPENING CEREMONY TO THEIR SICK 2 WEEK ENCAMPMENT!
Starring: Henry Kissinger. Alan Greenspan, George W. Bush, his dad Magog, and all the other ghouls that make up the 1%!
How some university academics make the case for paedophiles at summer conferences
(source) “Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.” Some yellowing tract from the Seventies or early Eighties, era of abusive celebrities and the infamous PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange? No. Anonymous commenters on some underground website? No again. The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was made not three decades ago but last July. It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge. Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.” Hebephilia is the sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds. Another attendee, and enthusiastic participant from the floor, was one Tom O’Carroll, a multiple child sex offender, long-time campaigner for the legalisation of sex with children and former head of the Paedophile Information Exchange. “Wonderful!” he wrote on his blog afterwards. “It was a rare few days when I could feel relatively popular!” Last week, after the conviction of Rolf Harris, the report into Jimmy Savile and claims of an establishment cover-up to protect a sex-offending minister in Margaret Thatcher’s Cabinet, Britain went into a convulsion of anxiety about child abuse in the Eighties. But unnoticed amid the furore is a much more current threat: attempts, right now, in parts of the academic establishment to push the boundaries on the acceptability of child sex. A key factor in what happened all those decades ago in the dressing rooms of the BBC, the wards of the NHS and, allegedly, the corridors of power was not just institutional failings or establishment “conspiracies”, but a climate of far greater intellectual tolerance of practices that horrify today. With the Pill, the legalisation of homosexuality and shrinking taboos against premarital sex, the Seventies was an era of quite sudden sexual emancipation. Many liberals, of course, saw through PIE’s cynical rhetoric of “child lib”. But to others on the Left, sex by or with children was just another repressive boundary to be swept away – and some of the most important backing came from academia. In 1981, a respectable publisher, Batsford, published Perspectives on Paedophilia, edited by Brian Taylor, a sociology lecturer at Sussex University, to challenge what Dr Taylor’s introduction called the “prejudice” against child sex. Disturbingly, the book was aimed at “social workers, community workers, probation officers and child care workers”. The public, wrote Dr Taylor, “generally thinks of paedophiles as sick or evil men who lurk around school playgrounds in the hope of attempting unspecified beastliness with unsuspecting innocent children”. That, he reassured readers, was merely a “stereotype”, both “inaccurate and unhelpful”, which flew in the face of the “empirical realities of paedophile behaviour”. Why, most adult-child sexual relationships occurred in the family! The perspectives of most, though not all, the contributors, appeared strongly pro-paedophile. At least two were members of PIE and at least one, Peter Righton, (who was, incredibly, director of education at the National Institute for Social Work) was later convicted of child sex crimes. But from the viewpoint of today, the fascinating thing about Perspectives on Paedophilia is that at least two of its contributors are still academically active and influential. Ken Plummer is emeritus professor of sociology at Essex University, where he has an office and teaches courses, the most recent scheduled for last month. “The isolation, secrecy, guilt and anguish of many paedophiles,” he wrote in Perspectives on Paedophilia, “are not intrinsic to the phenomen[on] but are derived from the extreme social repression placed on minorities … “Paedophiles are told they are the seducers and rapists of children; they know their experiences are often loving and tender ones. They are told that children are pure and innocent, devoid of sexuality; they know both from their own experiences of childhood and from the children they meet that this is not the case.” As recently as 2012, Prof Plummer published on his personal blog a chapter he wrote in another book, Male Intergenerational Intimacy, in 1991. “As homosexuality has become slightly less open to sustained moral panic, the new pariah of ‘child molester’ has become the latest folk devil,” he wrote. “Many adult paedophiles say that boys actively seek out sex partners … ‘childhood’ itself is not a biological given but an historically produced social object.” Prof Plummer confirmed to The Sunday Telegraph that he had been a member of PIE in order to “facilitate” his research. He said: “I would never want any of my work to be used as a rationale for doing ‘bad things’ – and I regard all coercive, abusive, exploitative sexuality as a ‘bad thing’. I am sorry if it has impacted anyone negatively this way, or if it has encouraged this.” However, he did not answer when asked if he still held the views he expressed in the Eighties and Nineties. A spokesman for Essex University claimed Prof Plummer’s work “did not express support for paedophilia” and cited the university’s charter which gave academic staff “freedom within the law to put forward controversial and unpopular opinions without placing themselves in jeopardy”. Graham Powell is one of the country’s most distinguished psychologists, a past president of the British Psychological Society and a current provider of psychology support services to the Serious Organised Crime Agency, the National Crime Squad, the Metropolitan Police, Kent Police, Essex Police and the Internet Watch Foundation. In Perspectives on Paedophilia, however, he co-authored a chapter which stated: “In the public mind, paedophile attention is generally assumed to be traumatic and to have lasting and wholly deleterious consequences for the victim. The evidence that we have considered here does not support this view … we need to ask not why are the effects of paedophile action so large, but why so small.” The chapter does admit that there were “methodological problems” with the studies the authors relied on which “leave our conclusions somewhat muted”. Dr Powell told The Sunday Telegraph last week that “what I wrote was completely wrong and it is a matter of deep regret that it could in any way have made things more difficult [for victims]”. He said: “The literature [scientific evidence] was so poor in 1981, people just didn’t realise what was going on. There was a lack of understanding at the academic level.” Dr Powell said he had never been a member of PIE. In other academic quarters, with rather fewer excuses, that lack of understanding appears to be reasserting itself. The Cambridge University conference, on July 4-5 last year, was about the classification of sexuality in the DSM, a standard international psychiatric manual used by the police and courts. After a fierce battle in the American Psychiatric Association (APA), which produces it, a proposal to include hebephilia as a disorder in the new edition of the manual has been defeated. The proposal arose because puberty in children has started ever earlier in recent decades and as a result, it was argued, the current definition of paedophilia – pre-pubertal sexual attraction – missed out too many young people. Ray Blanchard, professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto, who led the APA’s working group on the subject, said that unless some other way was found of encompassing hebephilia in the new manual, that was “tantamount to stating that the APA’s official position is that the sexual preference for early pubertal children is normal”. Prof Blanchard was in turn criticised by a speaker at the Cambridge conference, Patrick Singy, of Union College, New York, who said hebephilia would be abused as a diagnosis to detain sex offenders as “mentally ill” under US “sexually violent predator” laws even after they had completed their sentences. But perhaps the most controversial presentation of all was by Philip Tromovitch, a professor at Doshisha University in Japan, who stated in a presentation on the “prevalence of paedophilia” that the “majority of men are probably paedophiles and hebephiles” and that “paedophilic interest is normal and natural in human males”. O’Carroll, the former PIE leader, was thrilled, and described on his blog how he joined Prof Tromovitch and a colleague for drinks after the conference. “The conversation flowed most agreeably, along with the drinks and the beautiful River Cam,” he said. It’s fair to say the Tromovitch view does not represent majority academic opinion. It’s likely, too, that some of the academic protests against the “stigmatisation” of paedophiles are as much a backlash against the harshness of sex offender laws as anything else. Finally, of course, academic inquiry is supposed to question conventional wisdom and to deal rigorously with the evidence, whether or not the conclusions it leads you to are popular. Even so, there really is now no shortage of evidence about the harm done by child abuse. In the latest frenzy about the crimes of the past, it’s worth watching whether we could, in the future, go back to the intellectual climate which allowed them.
We are looking into starting a Roku Chanel which will make our content available on smart TVs and streaming boxes, free, through the DarkDox network! This takes mirrored servers to speed up our streaming capabilities in order to deliver content to users worldwide with no advertising, and no registration required. We also plan to work with documentary film makers to create DarkDox Exclusive programs. Help us take this to the next level!
This is it. The big one. The thing we have been fighting for almost 10 years now. Devil in the flesh. We are teaming up with DarkDox, Coffins Collective, Resist the Grove, & Resist Tyranny – Bohemian Grove Action and Resistance to bring you a 19 day, 12 state, U.S. Tour with Will Brack. Dougie Flesh and the Slashers are a hard maybe… stay tuned!
- Friday, July 6th Gainesville, Florida
- Saturday, July 7th Pensacola, Florida
- Sunday, July 8th New Orleans, Louisiana
- Monday, July 9th Austin, Texas
- Tuesday, July 10th El Paso, Texas
- Wednesday, July 11th Phoenix, Arizona
- Thursday, July 12th Los Angeles, California
- Friday, July 13th ” Santa Cruz, California”
- Saturday, July 14th Bohemian Grove, California
- Sunday, July 15th Bohemian Grove, California
- Monday, July 16th Reno, Nevada
- Tuesday, July 17th Salt Lake City, Utah
- Wednesday, July 18th ” Rawlins, Wyoming
- Thursday, July 19th Ogallala, Nebraska
- Friday, July 20th Boys Town, Nebraska
- Saturday, July 21st Kansas City, Missouri
- Sunday, July 22nd St. Louis, Missouri
- Monday, July 23rd Nashville, Tennessee
- Tuesday, July 24th Atlanta, Georgia
Conspiracy of Silence – The Franklin Cover Up Discovery Channel Unfinished Documenty Pulled From Production
Conspiracy of Silence is the never officially released Discovery Channel documentary about The Franklin Cover Up Case (also known as “The Franklin Scandal”) involving human trafficking, pedophilia, ritualistic abuse of children, murder, government cover ups, the Bohemian Grove, Hunter S. Thompson, Lawrence King, and author of The Franklin Cover Up, Satanism & Murder in Nebraska; John Decamp, and many other prominent U.S. political figures.
Download the ZIP archive of the film, book, and more here (1.27GB ZIP folder).
This zip folder includes:
- Conspiracy of Silence – The Franklin Cover-Up (1994) Documentary (video)
- Gary Caradori’s Interview with Paul Bonacci (video)
- John DeCamp Interview (video)
- Nancy Grace Johnny Gosch TV Special (3 Parts) (video)
- The Franklin Cover-Up & Johnny Gosch Story (video)
- The Franklin Cover-Up Audio File(Audiobook)
- The Franklin Cover-Up (Kindle format)
- The Franklin Cover-Up PDF
These interviews, film clips, and documents are disturbing and detailed. This is one of the largest and sickest cover ups that, in our opinion, is a corner stone in the globalist, Illuminati, government corruption, church corruption agenda.
DarkDox.com is recruiting. We are a free, open source archive of documents, videos and audio files The concept is simple We upload files create thumbnails and code them into our pages This creates a responsive interface for users similar to Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hulu and countless video platforms Instead of just clicking and streaming we offer the ability to directly download the file and keep it, forever. This allows you to archive replicate, syndicate, duplicate, modify, & use in your videos, graphics projections, and more. It needs to stay free and anonymous. No advertising. We need your help if you know how to use FTP copy and paste basic HTML know how to use WordPress or Photoshop. We want new content daily. Our sections to grow. This will take a hardcore] technical team What we do is not hard, but it takes time. The more people we can trust that are working on this, the better it will be for everyone. There is no financial gain in the infowar only pride in being part of what could one day be the worlds largest, free, & anonymous source of multimedia to educate the masses. Email email@example.com to get started. This is information warfare.
[DarkDox] We are off to a great start! With our YouTube channel only being hours old, we got a very unusual notification (see image to the right).
Not a copyright violation, but rather a “Community Guidelines” Strike because of “Spam & Deceptive Practices”.
This blows me away. This is a documentary about chemtrails and geoengineering. So let me get this straight; The government is allowed to have secret programs where they use chemical agents sprayed into the air for us to breath and have it enter our water supplies, coat our persons and belongings with whatever they feel like without our consent, but we are not allowed to make documentaries about it and share them on YouTube?
Did they just Fake News us? This is why this site exists.
Download Aerosol Crimes here!